Catalog Advanced Search
-
Contains 5 Component(s), Includes Credits Includes a Live Web Event on 12/14/2027 at 12:00 PM (EST)
This webinar focus on estimating erosion potential in earthen/vegetated non-structural spillways, identifying hydraulic limits of earth and vegetated auxiliary spillways, and developing methods to repair erosion in existing non-structural spillways.
Speakers: Karl Visser, PE, Freese & Nichols, Dam and Levee Engineer; James McNash, PE, Freese and Nichols, Senior Engineer/Engineer VI
PDHs: This webinar is eligible for 2 PDH credits.
This webinar will focus on estimating erosion potential in earthen or vegetated non-structural spillways, identifying the hydraulic limits of earth and vegetated auxiliary spillways, and developing effective methods for repairing erosion in existing non-structural spillways. Additional considerations include evaluating opportunities to increase the capacity of existing earth and vegetated spillways, as well as identifying structural alternatives for replacing non-structural spillways when improved capacity, reliability, or risk reduction is required.
Key Takeaways:
1. Estimating erosion potential in non-structural spillways.
2. Identifying hydraulic limits for earth/vegetated auxiliary spillways.
3. Repairing erosion in an existing non-structural spillway.
4. Adding capacity to an existing earth/vegetated spillway.
5. Identifying structural alternatives for replacing an earth/vegetated non-structural spillway.$i++ ?>Karl Visser
Senior Dam and Levee Engineer
Freese & Nichols
Karl is an experienced water resources engineer with deep expertise in auxiliary spillway erosion, dam breach analysis, and H&H design. He has provided technical guidance to federal, state and international users. Karl’s experience spans reviewing more than 200 dam rehabilitation projects nationwide, contributing to the 2019 update of the National Resources Conservation Service’s (NRCS) TR-60 Earth Dams and Embankments and mentoring the next generation of hydraulic engineers. He has also led training in various hydrology software, reviewed complex CFD models and co-led NRCS HEC-RAS efforts. Karl is known for communicating complex engineering concepts clearly, bringing technical depth and practical insight to water infrastructure challenges.
$i++ ?>James McNash, PE
Senior Engineer / Engineer VI
Freese and Nichols
James is a civil and geotechnical engineer for Freese and Nichols, Inc., practicing in dams and levees out of their Charlotte, North Carolina office. He has led or served as the geotechnical engineer for over thirty flood control dams and surface impoundments, evaluating the stability, erodibility, and performance of the embankments and spillways. In addition, he has experience characterizing subsurface stratigraphy, estimating engineering properties, and modeling earthen spillways within both SITES and WINDAM. He holds both a bachelor's and a master's degree from Georgia Institute of Technology and is a licensed professional engineer in several states within the southeastern United States.
-
Contains 5 Component(s), Includes Credits Includes a Live Web Event on 11/09/2027 at 12:00 PM (EST)
This webinar will review the common geotechnical laboratory tests used in dam engineering practice. Categories of tests include index, maximum and minimum, and engineering property tests.
Speakers: John France, PE, JWF Consulting LLC, President
PDHs: This webinar is eligible for 2 PDH credits.Geotechnical laboratory tests are used to understand soil composition and engineering properties to support analysis and design of dams. This webinar will review the common geotechnical laboratory tests used in dam engineering practice. Categories of tests to be discussed include:
• Index tests (gradation analysis, Atterberg limits tests, specific gravity tests, etc.).
• Maximum and minimum density tests.
• Engineering property tests (consolidation tests, permeability tests, direct shear tests, triaxial tests, etc.)The purpose and characteristics of each test will be reviewed, followed by comments on how the results are used in dam engineering.
Key Takeaways:
1. Understanding geotechnical index tests and what they tell us about soils.
2. Understanding laboratory density tests and how they are used in dam construction.
3. Understanding consolidation tests and how they are applied in settlement analyses.
4. Understanding permeability tests and how they are used in seepage analyses.
5. Understanding strength tests and how they are used in stability analyses.$i++ ?>John W. France, P.E., D.GE, D.WRE
President, JWF Consulting, LLC
JWF Consulting, LLC.
John France has over 50 years of consulting engineering experience. Most of his technical work has focused on dams and water retention structures. He has been responsible for the evaluation, analysis, design, and construction of embankment and roller compacted concrete dams and their appurtenant structures. He has served on numerous senior technical review boards and panels for dam safety projects for the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation; the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; the Tennessee Valley Authority; BC Hydro; Brookfield Renewable Energy; and Eagle Creek Hydropower. John was the team leader for the Independent Forensic Teams tasked with investigating the 2017 Oroville Dam spillway incident and the 2020 failures of Edenville and Sanford Dams, MI. He is an instructor for ASDSO training courses on seepage, stability analysis, and emergency action planning, and he has presented numerous ASDSO webinars and workshops on various geotechnical topics. John has twice received the ASDSO President’s Award, and in 2022 he received ASDSO’s Danny McCook Medal for contributions to geotechnical engineering practice in dam safety.
-
Contains 5 Component(s), Includes Credits Includes a Live Web Event on 10/12/2027 at 12:00 PM (EDT)
This webinar explores the role of riser and outlet structures in dam safety, reservoir operations, and regulatory compliance.
Speakers: Amanda Hess, PE, GFT, Vice President, Geotechnical, Dams and Hydraulics
PDHs: This webinar is eligible for 2 PDH credits.Understanding and Optimizing Riser and Outlet Structure Performance explores the role of riser and outlet structures in dam safety, reservoir operations, and regulatory compliance. This webinar examines the multiple purposes these structures serve—from normal releases and water supply to emergency drawdown—and the performance requirements they must meet under a range of operating conditions. Attendees will gain a practical understanding of the hydraulic controls governing riser and outlet behavior, including inlet, barrel, and outlet control, and how discharge is computed through these systems.
Building on these fundamentals, the webinar also acknowledges strategies to maximize the performance of both existing and proposed facilities. Topics include improving hydraulic efficiency through inlet modifications and evaluating the impacts of sliplining. The webinar will also address design considerations such as aeration and venting and terminal energy dissipation.
Key Takeaways:
1. What purposes do riser/outlet structures serve?
2. What requirements must riser/outlet structures meet?
3. What controls the hydraulics of riser/outlet structures? How do you compute discharge through a riser/outlet structure?
4. How can you maximize existing and proposed facilities and ensure proper functioning
5. How can a riser structure design account for energy losses in the riser and outlet system and provide energy dissipation at the terminus?
$i++ ?>Amanda J. Hess, P.E., CFM
Vice President, Geotechnical, Dams and Hydraulics
GFT
Amanda Hess is a vice president and hydrology and hydraulic group manager at GFT Infrastructure, Inc. She holds Bachelor and Master of Science degrees in civil engineering with a focus in water resources. Over her 25-year career, she has focused on design and application of hydrologic and hydraulic principles for dams. In that role, she has served as the lead hydrologic and hydraulic engineer for numerous spillway modification projects. She has provided supporting consulting services to several state dam safety departments on guidelines and regulations.
-
Contains 5 Component(s), Includes Credits Includes a Live Web Event on 09/14/2027 at 12:00 PM (EDT)
This webinar is about the analysis, design, construction, rehab, inspection, and management of dams and hydraulic structures. It includes emerging technologies and practical ways to incorporate new tools and approaches into your day-to-day work.
Speakers: Henrik Forsling, PE, Civil/Structural Engineer; Amanda Clarke, PE, Geotechnical Engineer; Golsa Mahdavi, PhD, Structural Engineer; all AECOM
PDHs: This webinar is eligible for 2 PDH credits.
This webinar is intended for dam owners and operators, dam safety regulators, engineers, consultants, contractors, construction managers and inspectors, and other professionals involved in the analysis, design, construction, rehabilitation, inspection, and management of dams and hydraulic structures. The webinar will be relevant to both experienced practitioners interested in emerging technologies and those seeking practical ways to incorporate new tools and approaches into their day-to-day work and dam safety programs.
Key Takeaways:
1. Identify emerging technologies and tools being applied to the analysis, design, construction, testing, and inspection of dams and hydraulic structures.2. Describe how digital tools and data-driven approaches, including digital twins and advanced modeling and visualization techniques, can support engineering evaluation, design, and construction.
3. Describe how AI and Machine Learning techniques can be used in anomaly detection and dam safety evaluation.
4. Recognize new and evolving construction technologies, such as intelligent compaction and automated data collection, and understand how they can improve construction quality, efficiency, consistency, documentation, and decision-making.
5. Evaluate emerging field testing and monitoring tools for assessing construction materials, placement conditions, concrete curing, and other construction quality parameters, including opportunities for more rapid or real-time feedback.
6. Discuss the practical benefits and limitations of adopting emerging technologies, including considerations related to accuracy, validation, cost, training, data management, regulatory requirements, and integration with established engineering practices.
7. Recognize opportunities to incorporate new technologies into day-to-day activities and broader dam safety and engineering programs while maintaining appropriate engineering judgment, quality control, and verification.$i++ ?>Henrik Forsling, PE
Civil/Structural Engineer
AECOM
Henrik is a licensed/registered professional engineer with 20 years of experience as a civil/structural engineer. The majority of his professional career has focused on dam safety-related projects, working with private, federal, and local/municipal clients. He has experience in condition assessment, analysis, evaluation, design and construction management of concrete and embankment dams, and appurtenant hydraulic structures and conveyance features such as intake and outlet works, spillways, penstocks, and canals.
$i++ ?>
Amanda Clarke, PE
Geotechnical Engineer
AECOM
Amanda Clarke is a geotechnical engineer with an undergraduate degree in civil engineering. She has experience in engineering analysis, potential failure modes analysis (PFMA), geotechnical investigations, and construction oversight. Amanda has supported quantitative and semi-quantitative risk analyses as a recorder for earthfill dams. Amanda’s construction experience includes inspections of earthworks projects and construction oversight of earthfill dams.
$i++ ?>
Golsa Mahdavi, PhD
Structural Engineer
AECOM
Golsa is a structural engineer with a Ph.D. focused on research and implementation of probabilistic nonlinear seismic analysis of dams affected by alkali-aggregate reaction (AAR). Her professional experience includes evaluation, linear and non-linear analysis, and design of concrete dams and appurtenant concrete hydraulic structures.
-
Contains 5 Component(s), Includes Credits Includes a Live Web Event on 07/13/2027 at 12:00 PM (EDT)
This webinar presents a practical framework for understanding how spillway alternatives are evaluated and screened based on site-specific conditions and project objectives.
Speakers: Brad Kirksey, PE, Freese and Nichols, Inc., Principal / National Technical Specialist
PDHs: This webinar is eligible for 2 PDH credits.
Spillway selection is one of the most important decisions in dam planning, design, and rehabilitation. While a wide range of spillway types are available, some configurations are far more common than others. The reason is not that certain spillway types are universally superior, but that project constraints often make some alternatives more practical, constructible, and cost-effective than others. The engineer's challenge is not simply to select a spillway type, but to thoroughly investigate the site and project conditions to identify the spillway system most compatible with those constraints.
This webinar presents a practical framework for understanding how spillway alternatives are evaluated and screened based on site-specific conditions and project objectives. The discussion examines how hydrology, hydraulics, topography, geology, foundation erodibility, reservoir operations, constructability, flood routing during construction, and existing infrastructure influence the selection of spillway control structures, conveyance features, and energy dissipation systems. Special attention is given to the role of principal and auxiliary spillways and how they can be combined to manage both frequent and extreme flood events.
Using a decision-tree approach and real-world case studies, the webinar demonstrates how engineers progress from a broad range of potential alternatives toward a smaller set of viable spillway concepts. Attendees will gain an understanding of the spillway systems most commonly used in the United States, the site constraints that influence their applicability, and the practical considerations that often govern their selection. The presentation emphasizes that successful spillway selection is not simply a hydraulic exercise, but a multidisciplinary evaluation of technical, operational, constructability, and economic considerations.
Key Takeaways:
1. Identify the major spillway control structures, conveyance systems, and energy dissipation features commonly used at dams in the United States.2. Recognize how topography, geology, foundation erodibility, hydrology, hydraulics, operations, and rehabilitation constraints influence spillway selection.
3. Understand the role of principal and auxiliary spillways and how they can be combined to manage both frequent and extreme flood events.
4. Develop a structured alternatives screening process using a decision-tree or alternatives matrix approach.
5. Evaluate constructability, flood routing during construction, operational requirements, and project economics as part of spillway system selection.$i++ ?>Brad Kirksey, PE
Principal / National Technical Specialist
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
Brad Kirksey, P.E., is a national technical specialist with Freese and Nichols, Inc. and has more than 18 years of experience in dam safety, hydraulic structures, water resources engineering, and construction. His experience includes the planning, design, rehabilitation, inspection, risk evaluation, and emergency response for embankment and concrete dams throughout the United States. Brad has served as a designer, technical lead, project manager, and advisor on projects involving spillways, outlet works, reservoirs, levees, and flood control infrastructure. He is particularly interested in the practical engineering decisions that influence dam safety and the successful implementation of complex dam rehabilitation projects.
-
Contains 5 Component(s), Includes Credits Includes a Live Web Event on 04/13/2027 at 12:00 PM (EDT)
This webinar explores a pivotal decade in U.S. water policy by tracing President Jimmy Carter’s lasting influence on dam safety and water resources.
Speakers: Nathaniel Gee, PE
PDHs: This webinar is eligible for 2 PDH credits.
This webinar explores a pivotal decade in U.S. water policy by tracing President Jimmy Carter’s lasting influence on dam safety and water resources. From early controversies like the Sprewell Bluff Dam to the national reckoning after the Teton Dam failure, we follow the momentum that led to Carter’s dam project review hit list, landmark congressional hearings, and the Presidential Memo that reshaped federal dam safety efforts. We also highlight key events and legislation, including major dam failures, the FEMA dam safety office, and the development of national guidelines. Join us as we commemorate 50 years of progress and examine how decisions from the 1970s continue to guide today’s dam safety programs.
Key Takeaways:
1. Recognize the long‑term impacts of 1970s dam safety initiatives on today’s federal, state, and local dam safety programs.2. Understand how the policy shifts of the 1970s shaped the modern regulatory and interagency framework that dam safety engineers work within, helping participants navigate today’s requirements with clearer context.
3. Recognize how past failures and investigations established the foundations of current risk assessment practices, allowing engineers to better appreciate why certain standards and methodologies exist.
4. Identify lessons from Carter‑era coordination between federal agencies to improve today’s collaboration across local, state, and federal partners.$i++ ?>Nathaniel Gee, Ph.D. P.E.
Gee is a dam safety engineer with over 20 years of experience. He has managed some of the nation’s most significant dams, including the iconic Hoover Dam. He loves to write both history and fiction, including his romantic comedy "Of Pigs and Priests". "Failure and Fortitude" is his third published book. He has also published in technical journals and regular speaks at dam safety conferences. He received his PhD from Brigham Young University focusing on dam failure investigations. He lives on a mountain in Tennessee where the lively chaos of his eleven children keeps life interesting, and he continues to balance engineering, family life, writing, and performing with a curiosity that keeps him searching for the next great story.
-
Contains 19 Component(s)
This product is recommended for those responsible for day-to-day oversight of dam operations and maintenance, HOA maintenance person or company, and county/city staff responsible for dam maintenance.
This product is recommended for those responsible for day-to-day oversight of dam operations and maintenance, HOA maintenance person or company, and county/city staff responsible for dam maintenance.
This training includes parts of introductory topics from some of ASDSO’s previously recorded technical webinars. Participants will view videos and take a short quiz on each topic. If the user completes each section and passes the quiz for each topic a certificate of completion is available.Topics include:
- History of Dam Safety Governance in the US
- Introduction to Embankment Dams
- Intro to Gravity Dams
- Introduction to Inspecting Dams for Owners and Operators
- Developing Operations and Maintenance Manuals for Dams
- Responding to Dam Emergencies
- Human Factors in the Edenville Dam Failure
There are no Professional Development Hours for this product.
-
Contains 3 Component(s), Includes Credits
The focus of this webinar is to present the most common failure modes at dams and provide information on actions that can be taken to prevent or delay each failure mode. Case studies will be used to show examples of successful interventions.
Speakers: Paul Schweiger, Gannett Fleming Inc. and Greg Richards, Gannett Fleming, Inc.
PDHs: This webinar is eligible for 2 PDH credits.
Many dam failures have been averted by dam owners and engineers taking quick and effective action to intervene and stop an active dam failure from progressing. The focus of this webinar is to present the most common failure modes at dams and provide information on actions that can be taken to prevent or delay each failure mode. Case studies will be used to show examples of successful interventions. Actions that could potentially do harm and make conditions worse will also be discussed. The seminar will conclude with an overview of the new “Dam Intervention Toolbox” and how this interactive resource can be used as a companion to an Emergency Action Plan to help dam owners be better prepared to respond to a dam emergency.
Five Learning Objectives of This Course:
• Understand the most common failure modes at dams.
• Know what emergency measures can be taken to stop common failure modes at dams.
• Be aware of actions that can potentially make conditions worse.
• How to become prepared to respond to a dam emergency.
• Learn about the new “Dam Intervention Toolbox.”
$i++ ?>Paul G. Schweiger, P.E.
Vice President and Technical Director Dams and Hydraulics
GFT Infrastructure, Inc.
Paul has been with GFT for 39 years. During that time, he has provided engineering consulting services for more than 500 dams throughout the United States and Canada. Paul is an approved Federal Energy Regulatory Commission facilitator and Independent Consultant for conducting potential failure modes analysis exercises, Emergency Action Plan exercises, and Part 12 dam assessments. He regularly serves as an expert hydrology and hydraulics engineer on Independent External Peer Review panels for United States Army Corps of Engineers dam and flood control projects and has served on the National Dam Safety Review Board as the Private Sector Representative. Paul is a frequent instructor for Association of State Dam Safety Officials (ASDSO) engineering seminars. He served on the Board of Consultants for the Oroville Spillway Emergency Recovery Project and is currently serving on several Boards of Consultants for dam projects throughout the United States.
$i++ ?>Greg Richards, P.E., CFM
Senior Project Manager
GFT
Greg Richards is a senior project Manager and hydraulic and hydrologic engineer at GFT in Bountiful, Utah. He obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in civil engineering from Utah State University. He is responsible for the management and execution of hydraulic and hydrologic analyses and design for flood control reservoirs, spillways, outlet works, stilling basins, bridges, and stream channel improvements. Greg has authored or contributed to several dam safety policy documents on both the federal and state levels. These include the Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety: Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams (FEMA P-94); Guidelines for Hazard Potential Classification and Inflow Design Flood Selection (including a simplified risk-informed decision-making approach) for the New Mexico Dam Safety Bureau; and Risk-Informed Dam Inspection Guidelines for the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation. He was the 2017 recipient of ASDSO’s Joseph J. Ellam President’s Award and currently serves as a member of ASDSO’s Advisory and Dam Failure and Incidents committees, leader of the Dam Safety Toolbox Committee, and co-chair of the DamFailures.org Subcommittee.
- 1. Introduction:
- a. Why This Topic Is Important
- i. Share statistics on recent dam failures and consequences
- ii. Being prepared to intervene to stop or delay an active dam failure is often overlooked and not included or elaborated upon in many EAPs. Response time is limited and being prepared is the key to success.
- iii. Benefits of an effective intervention (Prevent failure, provide more time to warn and evacuate, reduce consequences)
- iv. Consequences of a harmful intervention
- b. What You Will Learn
- i. Most common dam failure modes
- ii. Actions that can be taken to prevent or delay each failure mode
- iii. Actions that should not be taken, or that should be taken with caution – do no harm!
- iv. Examples from case studies of responses (successful and unsuccessful) to actual dam emergencies
- v. Know where to find the best resources
- a. Why This Topic Is Important
- 2. Most Common Dam Failure Modes
- a. What Is A Dam Failure Mode?
- b. Most Common Dam Failure Modes and Early Warning Signs
- i. Seepage and internal erosion (piping, ….)
- ii. Spillway Erosion
- iii. Dam Overtopping
- iv. Structural instability (slope instability, sliding, overturning, settlement)
- v. Other
- 3. Intervention
- a. Intervention Action Common to All Dam Failure Modes – Lower the Reservoir!
- i. First, do no harm by making releases
- 1. Loss of resource consequences
- 2. Potential downstream consequences
- 3. Potential structural consequences
- 4. Potential loss of outlet control
- ii. What to do if you do not have operable outlet works
- 1. Siphons
- 2. Controlled breach
- 3. Lower downstream reservoir to contain or absorb breach flows (special case)
- i. First, do no harm by making releases
- b. Seepage and Internal Erosion
- i. Plugging leak from upstream side
- ii. Reducing hydraulic gradient from downstream side
- iii. Intercepting and filtering seepage
- c. Spillway Erosion
- i. Divert flows away from eroding area(s)
- ii. Armor eroding areas
- iii. Stopping or limiting erosive flow
- d. Dam Overtopping
- i. Lower reservoir in advance of pending flood
- ii. Raise dam
- iii. Armor dam
- iv. Construct auxiliary spillway
- a. Intervention Action Common to All Dam Failure Modes – Lower the Reservoir!
- 4. What About Being Prepared to Respond to Public Safety Incidents?
- 5. Available Resources
- a. Dam Owner Emergency Intervention Toolbox
- b. ASDSO/FEMA Lessons Learned from Dam Incidents and Failure Website
- 1. Introduction:
-
Contains 3 Component(s), Includes Credits
This is an ON-DEMAND version of the November 10, 2020 live webinar.The aim of this webinar is to describe key socio-psychological insights and apply them to the practice of dam engineering, with an emphasis on judgment and decision-making.
Speaker: Irfan A. Alvi, P.E.
PDHs: This webinar is eligible for 2 PDH credits.
Dam engineering involves dams, but is done by and for people. As a result, in order to achieve dam benefits while maintaining dam safety, we need to understand not just dams, but also the people involved in designing, constructing, operating, maintaining, and benefiting from them. Social scientists have been studying people scientifically for more than a century, and we are now at a point historically where the social sciences have generated valuable insights into human thought and behavior.
The aim of this webinar is to describe key socio-psychological insights and apply them to the practice of dam engineering, with an emphasis on judgment and decision-making. We will find that judgment and decision-making are influenced by aspects such as subconscious and conscious cognition, perception, belief, memory, self-concept, use of heuristics, cognitive and motivational biases, emotions, and group dynamics, and expertise, all of which contribute to both human capability and human fallibility.
This webinar will explore all of these aspects, will include extensive audience participation, and will provide evidence-based suggestions for how we can improve our judgment and decision-making at both individual and group levels. The insights and suggestions presented in this webinar will be linked with the instructor's prior work on human factors to provide an overall framework for dam risk management.Four Learning Objectives of This Course:
• Understand the physical, social, and evolutionary context in which dam engineers operate
• Learn about the two main ways in which people “think”
• Learn about the socio-psychological factors which contribute to human fallibility and limitations, as well as human capabilities
• Learn ways to improve judgment, decision-making, and risk management in dam engineering$i++ ?>Irfan Alvi, P.E.
President & Chief Engineer
Alvi Associates, Inc.
Irfan A. Alvi, PE is the president & chief engineer of Alvi Associates, Inc. in Towson, Maryland. He has 35 years of multidisciplinary engineering experience for dams and other infrastructure, involving many hundreds of projects. His experience related to dams includes forensic investigation, human factors, new design, rehabilitation design, inspection, nondestructive testing, hydrologic/hydraulic analysis, structural analysis, stability analysis, risk analysis, and construction management. His project involving rehabilitation of Prettyboy Dam in Maryland was the ASDSO 2010 National Rehabilitation Project of the Year. He is a member of the ASDSO Dam Failure & Incidents Committee and the Public Safety Around Dams Committee. He has presented four ASDSO webinars related to human factors and judgment & decision-making. He served as the human factors lead on the independent forensic teams which investigated the 2017 spillways incident at Oroville Dam and the 2020 Edenville and Sanford Dam failures.
• Judgment and decision-making research
• Factors influencing judgement & decision-making
o The human situation
o Two kinds of thinking
o Heuristics
o Cognitive biases & expertise
o Perception & belief
o Memory
o Emotions
o Groups
o Creativity
• Judgment
• Decision-making
• Risk management -
Contains 3 Component(s), Includes Credits
This is an ON-DEMAND version of the October 13, 2020 live webinar. This course will involve the presentation of the Delhi Dam failure case history. Delhi Dam failed on July 24, 2010 during a record storm.
Speakers: William R. Fiedler and Wayne King
PDHs: This webinar is eligible for 2 PDH credits.This webinar will involve the presentation of the Delhi Dam failure case history. Delhi Dam failed on July 24, 2010 during a record storm. The failure was a result of a number of factors all contributing to the ultimate failure. The review of dam failure by a forensic team allowed for a good understanding of the mechanisms that led to failure. Analyses were performed, which provided valuable insights into the weight of the contributions from the key factors. This webinar will describe in detail the history of Delhi Dam prior to the failure, a chronology of events leading to dam failure, studies and analysis performed as part of the forensic team efforts, and the findings and recommendations from the forensic team report.
Five Learning Objectives of This Webinar:
- Compounding mechanisms can increase the chance of a dam failing.
- Loadings that have never been experienced before at a dam can reveal deficiencies.
- Deferred maintenance on key features can contribute to dam failure.
- Early warning can prevent, or at least reduce, life loss from dam failure.
- In-depth evaluations of dam failures can provide valuable insights into case histories.
$i++ ?>William R. Fiedler
Senior Technical Advisor
HDR
Bill had 42 years of experience in hydraulic and structural engineering designs for concrete dams and appurtenant structures with the Bureau of Reclamation. At Reclamation, he served as a technical specialist and design team leader for numerous water resource projects. In the later part of his career, he served as a member of Reclamation’s Risk Advisory Team, which was responsible for developing additional risk analysis methodologies and providing training for Reclamation staff. Bill has particular expertise in concrete dam and spillway modifications. He has written numerous papers focused on dam safety evaluations and dam safety modifications. He was a lead author on a Reclamation manual focused on drains for dams and on a FEMA manual focused on flood overtopping protection for dams. For the past three years, he has worked at HDR in the role of senior technical advisor.
$i++ ?>Wayne B. King, P.E.
Atlanta Regional Engineer, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Mr King has been with the Division of Dam Safety and Inspections(D2SI) at FERC since 1993 and has been the Atlanta Regional Engineer since 2012. The ARO has dam safety over-site of Non Federal owned Hydro-power projects consisting of 194 High Potential Hazard , 14 Significant Hazard Potential and 130 Low Potential Hazard Projects where all aspects of dam engineering are reviewed , and evaluated. Mr King has presented case studies at ASDSO, USSD, Hydrovision, ICODS and CEATI conferences and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers webinars. Mr King was the leader for the FERC Team conducting the investigation of the Taum Sauk Breach . Prior to FERC , Mr King with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers at Headquarters, Huntsville Division and New Orleans District involved in flood control and navigation structures, military construction, engineering criteria development and dam safety. Mr King has a BS and MS from Michigan Technological University and is a Registered Engineer in the State of Louisiana.
1. Dam Failure Event
2. Delhi Dam Background
3. Independent Panel of Engineers
4. Timeline of Failure
5. Geotechnical Considerations
6. Hydrology and Hydraulic Considerations
7. Emergency Response
8. Overall Findings
9. Status of Delhi Dam Today